HomeBlogGalleryCalendarLinksContactsPolls

Socialist taxation? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Austin Mitchell   
21 April 2008
Here’s how we redistribute taxation as a Socialist Government
 
The proposed abolition of the 10% income tax band <http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/apr/20/tax.tradeunions> hurts the poor and has quite rightly attracted widespread condemnation. The government claims that the restoration of the 10% band would cost around £7 billion and the predictable response <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7357085.stm> is that we can't afford it. Here are twelve ways that the government can finance the restoration of the 10% income tax band. They can also help the worse-off citizens by raising personal allowances <http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/tax_expenditures/table1-6.pdf>, which the Treasury's own figures show would cost around £4.3 billion for each 10% increment.
1.      Marginal income tax rate of 50%: The government could consider levying a marginal rate of income of 50% on incomes over £100,000. This alone has a potential to raise tax revenue of nearly £7 billion a year.
 
2.      Abolish the artificial ceiling on National Insurance Contributions (NIC): This is a regressive tax. Government's own data <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080107/text/80107w0069.htm#08010896002923> shows that someone earning £12,000 a year pays 6.21% of their income in NIC. This rises to 8.61% for annual income of £24,000, but due to an artificial ceiling it falls to 3.91% for someone on annual earnings of £100,000. The abolition <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070427/text/70427w0010.htm> of the upper income limit can generate additional tax revenues of nearly £9 billion each year.
 
3.      Restrict tax relief on pension contributions to basic tax rate only: Many ordinary people are unable to put enough away for pensions. This is the inevitable outcome of a highly skewed distribution of income. The tax relief on pension contributions is estimated to be over £21 billion a year. Most of it is claimed by around 3 million higher rate tax payers. The government <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070427/text/70427w0010.htm> admits that "If relief on individual contributions were constrained to the basic rate of tax, this amount of relief would fall by one quarter" i.e. £5 billion could be made available to help the poor and pensioners.
 
4.      Adjust capital gains tax rate: The government has reduced <http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/mar/23/property.tax> capital gains tax (CGT) to 18%. In contrast, for 2008-20009 the proposed basic rate of income tax <http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm> is 20%, and the marginal rises to 40% for taxable incomes over £36,000 per annum. Income is income whether it is raised from capitals gains, trade or salary and should be taxed in the same way. The current divide offers the well-off plenty of incentives to convert income to capital gains and pay taxes at a lower rate. There should be no difference between the taxation of income and CGT. This has the potential raise over a billion pounds.
 
5.      Target organised tax avoidance: The UK is estimated to be losing between £97 billion and £150 billion <http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/corporate_law/article671458.ece> of tax revenues each year. Companies and rich individuals use offshore tax havens, trusts, transfer pricing and even spurious royalty programmes to avoid taxes. Despite a lot of headline grabbing speeches, little dent has been made into this vast figure.
 
6.      Deduct tax at source from dividends: Companies are permitted to pay dividends to foreign investors without deducting tax at source. In 2006, Arcadia chief Philip Green <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2005/oct/21/executivesalaries.executivepay> paid a dividend of £1.3 billion. £1.2 billion of that went to his wife, domiciled in Monaco because shares were held in her name. As a result, no UK income tax was payable. A UK domiciled person would have paid income tax of over £300 million. Many others <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/jul/10/frontpagenews.uknews> also take advantage of this legal loophole. So the solution is to tax income where is arises.
 
7.      Charge full VAT for aviation fuel. Currently it enjoys exemptions. The ending of this exemption can raise £5billion - £7 billion.
 
8.      Land Value Tax: Projects such as the Jubilee Line in London, building of motorways, roads, parks and other publicly funded amenities have resulted in vast increases in the value of land in adjacent increases. Almost all of it is due to public expenditure rather than any activity by the owners. A land value tax should clawback some of the increase.
 
9.      Abolish ID Cards: The government's ID card bonanza is a veritable bonanza for IT companies and consultants. Yet the need for the cards has not been established. It is doubtful that reliable and safe technology can be produced. The abolition of the ID cards <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/06/28/nid28.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/06/28/ixnewstop.html> project would produce savings of around £7 billion.
 
10. End the war in Afghanistan and Iraq: A conservative estimate is that the never-ending war in Iraq and Afghanistan is costing around £5 billion a year. That money could be used to alleviate poverty at home.
 
11. Tobin Tax: Speculation on the currency, commodity and stock markets is rife. When things go wrong the taxpayers is expected to bail out the speculators. Why not levy a small Tobin tax to deal with the consequences of speculation? A global Tobin tax <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9ea4923c-0b0e-11dd-8ccf-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F9ea4923c-0b0e-11dd-8ccf-0000779fd2ac.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brettonwoods.org%2Fnews%2F%3Fp%3D600> one-hundredth of a percentage point can raise $230 billion to fight poverty at home and abroad. Think what a quarter of one percent could raise!
 
12. Windfall Taxes: Water, gas, electricity and oil companies have been making bumper profits by heaping huge price rises on consumers. Part of their excessive profits should be clawed back through windfall taxes.
 
The ultimate aim must be increase tax free personal allowances to free anyone on the national minimum wage from income tax and national insurance contributions. The monies can also be used to raise the UK state <http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2007/nov/13/statepensions.personalfinancenews> pension, currently averaging at just 17% of earnings, compared to an EU average of 57%, and exempt many essential items from VAT altogether.
 
Conservatives would like to make political capital, job of the opposition, out of it. But it is worth recalling that they
 
 
 
- introduced the biggest hike in indirect taxes (VAT); -destroyed the state pension by abolishing the link with earnings; -opposed the national minimum wage -imposed full VAT on domestic fuel -did not have a fuel "winter" allowance for pensioners -provided huge cuts in direct taxes for the rich.
 
 
 
 
 
< Prev   Next >

Articles By Topic
Housing
Opinions
News Flash
Monetary Policy
General Ramblings
House Magazine Diary
Council Housing
New Statesman
Yorkshire Post
Top Up Fees
Election 05
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image